rpm2013_idos

**REVIEW OF INTERMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES INDICATORS**

 * GENETICS THEME**

Data RS + Develop poverty / welfare mapping approaches, exploit the digital information technology for site-specific feed technologies, low cost ground truth collection (production environment) mobile phones IASA
 * TARGETING SUSTAINABLE INTERVENTIONS **


 * Improvement on partner adoption + understanding stakeholders
 * Get better understanding of adoption
 * Impact, simple
 * Accessible
 * Ex-ante multi- currency environmental assessment
 * Tradeoff analyses of intervention
 * Poverty vs. Environmental vs. Equity vs. nutrition matrix – tradeoffs, synergies
 * Apply economic, environmentaland social criteria in identifying interventions
 * Develop a full lifecycle analysis approach for our VCs
 * Use VC w/ TS – improve knowledge about impacts
 * Assess smallhoder vs. industrial systems – diff. dimensions
 * Develop a process with universal buy-in e.g. 1. map VC, 2. Analyse VC, 3. Use right tools and actors to prioritise interventions
 * Focus on meeting present and future market needs
 * How can scaling up and out happen?
 * Lessons learned from previous interventions
 * Identify champions at each stage of the VC – showcase some case studies to demonstrate usability
 * It is sustainable if interventions are integrated into the __structure__ of the system
 * A comprehensive ?? demand-supply ??? with environmental implications
 * Reachable outcomes, flexible intermediate milestones
 * Inequalities, efficiency


 * Value chain? - Maybe Tanzania Diary (ek: flip chart not labelled)**

1. Indicators a) Milk/animal/period b) Mortality rate c) Fertility / reproductive indices d) Morbidity e) Milk/input use 2. Reasonable change in indicator - Double productivity across systems 3. Reasonable no. of beneficiaries - 2000,000 households IDO2: Increased quantity and improved quality of milk supplied from smallholder and market systems (qns not clear) 1. Indicators a) Quantity produced, seasonality (fluctuation in production) b) Quality indicators Best indicators: quantity produced
 * IDO1: increased dairy productivity in small-scale production systems**

quality indicators (hygiene) 2 Reasonable changes in indication a) Quantity: doubling quantity of milk produced b) Quality: minimum standards for hygienic milk 3. Reasonable number of beneficiaries a) Consumers b) Producers – 75%

Adoption domain (see picture) Productivity in pigs systems Increase per year productivity
 * PIG VALUE CHAIN IN UGANDA**
 * Piglets weaned – litter size
 * Growth rate – mortality
 * Mortality of growers / mature
 * |||| FOR HOUSEHOLD PARTICIPATION ||
 * **IDO** || **Indicator** || **Change** ||
 * Productivity || Kg pork per animal per year || 1.5 – 2.0 ||
 * ^  || Piglets weaned/sow/ year || 10% ||
 * ^  || % mortality piglets || 4% ||
 * Quality and Quantity || Off take rate, inspection and quality assurance || 5% ||
 * Employment and income || % involvement of women and vulnerable along the value chain || Up to 20% in 10 year (it is not change per year) ||
 * ^  || Contribution to household income || 5% ||
 * Nutrient gap || % of energy and protein intake from animal food diseases || - ||
 * ^  || Calories and protein grams from animal sources || - ||
 * Environmental impact || Smell/air quality ||  ||
 * ^  || Water quality (bactemiol count) ||   ||
 * ^  || Use of manure as fertilizer ||   ||
 * Policies || Inclusion of pigs in development agenda ||  ||

- Productivity - Income and employment - Availability and access - Nutrient gap - Environmental ‘trotter’ print - Policy, money, investment Adoption domain: ?? Target number of beneficiaries?? Piglet mortality Litter size / farrowing period / kg pig/pork / unit of inputs / lwg / (feed unit) / land unit / time / finished pig / sow % contribution of pig enterprise to HH income / HH income delivered from pig enterprise / value-added generated by value chain actor / full time labour equivalent (disaggregated) / returning to labour / US$/kg pork / labour typology shifts Marketable surplus / growth in supply at all levels / per capita consumption / who is consuming?? Relative contribution of pork to HH diet / total calories supplied by pork CHG emission / unit output Number of programmes / $ investment by smallholders (public, private donor) All holder household pig producers and value chain actors / over 10-12 years
 * PIG VALUE CHAIN IN VIETNAM**

IDO: issue silvopastrol system (definition) IDO6: last indicator
 * DUAL PURPOSE CATTLE IN NICARAGUA**
 * Public/private policy makers influenced by 5 briefs on pro-poor small scale production and marketing systems with special attention to women in VCs
 * Investment level increased by (X%....) from public, private sector donors

IDO1: Fish productivity increased by 40% in 10 years IDO2: 75% total fish production in 10 years IDO3: 40% increase in employment for youth and women, 30% of which is attributed to women IDO4: 5% reduction of the micro-nutrient gap among target groups IDO5: 20% reduction of global warming potential (GWP) per ton of fish production IDO6: Capital investment in the aquaculture value chain increased by 100% (ex: feed manufacturing, intensification)
 * EGYPT AQUACULTURE VALUE CHAIN**

1.Productivity 20% increase from the present production Calf mortality reduced by 40% from basal value Quality of milk should not deteriorate (on the basis of fat and SNF) Disease outbreak should be ‘zero’ Mastitis, endrometritis reduced by 50% from base value 2. Food safety indicators / consumption % of people consuming milk No outbreaks of borne diseases eg salmonellosis Clean milk production across the value chain 3. 50-60% enhance in women/men participation, 290, 000 HH in one value chain OUR BEST INDICATOR
 * DAIRY VALUE CHAIN (INDIA)**
 * 20% increase in milk production
 * 50% increase in income